Government under fire after failure to reform licensing laws
Tuesday, August 11th, 2009
The Government has come under fire from a range of music trade bodies including UK Music Chief Executive Feargal Sharkey after rejecting numerous recent recommendations to relax certain licensing laws for live music gigs.
This followed the Government response to a report submitted by the Culture, Media and Sport Committee that ruled out a much discussed licensing exemption for venues with a maximum capacity of 200 people. The Committee had also suggested reintroducing a ‘two in a bar’ rule, which had previously allowed venues to host live music performed by one or two musicians without a permit, prior to the introduction of the Licensing Act 2003.
However, Whitehall officials rejected this notion and also stated that the Metropolitan Police currently had no plans to drop the highly controversial Form 696.
In a statement on the UK Music website, Sharkey said: “Yet again we are told to wait. Yet again we are told that there will be another new review process, more meetings and yet another group, this time charged specifically with trying to develop loopholes which exploit a deeply flawed and ill-conceived Licensing Act. At what point does someone within Government become brave enough to acknowledge that it is time to raise a hand, time to admit they have got it wrong and time to fix it”.
Sharkey went on to state that the Government had not given sufficient explanation for its decisions and had consistently failed to provide evidence to demonstrate how music is linked with noise, crime and disorder.
Following this, the Government were also criticised by The Musicians’ Union and Parliament’s Culture Select Committee Chair, John Whittingdale for ignoring such key recommendations. As reported by Music Week, Whittingdale spoke out against the lack of licensing reform at the Musicians’ Union conference, describing the Labour Government’s response as “Utterly pathetic and hopeless”.
Tory MP Whittingdale also advocated the previously reported proposed copyright extension in the UK and joined in the debate regarding piracy, backing the ‘Graduated Response’ system proposed by Sharkey and documented last month in The Gen.
UK Music is an umbrella organization aiming to represent the interests of the UK’s commercial Music Industry. Its members include the Association of Independent Music (AIM), British Academy of Songwriters, Composers & Authors (BASCA), British Recorded Music Industry (BPI), The PRS for Music, Music Managers Forum (MMF), Music Publishers Association Limited (MPA), Musicians’ Union (MU) and Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL).
Have your say! Is this further evidence of a regressive and ineffective Government approach to live music licensing reforms? Is it indicative that the Government are incapable of addressing the key issues and industry concerns surrounding live music? What are your thoughts on 696, ‘two in a bar’ rules, UK Music etc?
